Maldives has become probably the first micro-state to have a Human Rights Ambassador. This would be seen by many as an indication of our intention to proactively promote and internationally advocate for human rights. After all, why else would a country the size of Maldives opt to have a human rights ambassador? Most micro and small states that I know of limit their engagement in the area of human rights to the domestic front. Championing human rights, I don’t think, would be seen by many to be within the gamut of foreign policy of a microstate.
Over the last few years, we have done a remarkably good job in the area of human rights. In fact I can’t think of any other microstate that made the kind of strides we made in this area in such a short span of time. On the domestic front we developed a well functioning Human Right Commission. Internationally, we acceded to most of the international conventions such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the UN Convention against Torture, the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women – just to name a few. We have also successfully completed the diffusion all the criticisms we faced in the aftermath of the 2003 jail shooting incident - kudos to Dr. Shaheed for what he did as Foreign Minister.
The bottom-line is, given the size of Maldives and its geopolitical significance, I believe we have put more than adequate resources in this area and we shouldn’t be spending any more of our meagre resources to venture into new areas in human rights. In fact we have been so much engrossed in human rights and political reforms that we have completely forgotten about other important areas such as economic reforms. Anymore resources and energy in this area is only going to further clog and dampen the much needed economic reforms.
10 comments:
bro, who gave u the freedom to blog? mohamed nasheed!
@anonymous 2:34 AM
i am sure the blogger (naim) will reply to you but i thought i will also leave a reply. for your information i am a blogger and a writer who has been writing and publishing my writings online for almost TEN years. i was writing even when Mohamed Nasheed was banished to a small island in Raa Atoll. I was blogging and writing even when he was detained in 2005 after being dragged by the Star Force across Republican Square. I am not undermining the sacrifices that Nasheed has made for this nation. But I want to tell you that we were writing even when we faced the prospect of jail under Gayoom's rule. It is not Nasheed who gave us the freedom to blog. It is us who decided that we will blog.
@naimbe
the fiasco at Reethi Rah makes me think. is our human rights situation now ok? when the home minister who owns several resorts order the police to go to a resort and apprehend labourers there using pepper spray...
anonymous 4.39 has raised a very relevant question. but i believe naimbe also has a very good point about economic reforms.
human rights is important still. but then the prblem with us is that we are giving undue importance to human rights as we are putting a disproportionately large amount of our resoruces into human rights and political reform at the cost of our economy. why our people have felt human right is so important is because of the absolute poverty we live in. since the differences in income distribution is so high the majority of the poor peole feel that their rights have been violated. if economy can be improved and if people had decent incomes they would find proper housing, good food and evereything else. now the rights issue is so important becasue of the discrepancy in incomes.
bwt - a very good blog. keep up the good work.
nafiz
Addition to what the blogger has said i just wanted to add something.
Since human rights commission is an independent commission and all the members are members who are approved by the People's majlis, i dont see any reason why Nasheed has to appoint another AMBASSADOR to the commission. i think this will lead to government's influence over the commission, and by the way dont the commission has a commissioner?
anonymous 12:36 - yeah, beats me. why on earth appoint a new human rights ambassador when u have a full fledged human rights commission.?? this is insane. now human rights ambassador is encroaching on the mandate of HRC!!!
Human rights my foot. This is what we call in Maldivian language "bai elhun". This is latheef's share. Oops and jenny too.Payrole board.
Qayyoom used the system of eliminating all competition through brutal force and Anni uses giving a piece to silent the competition. As always people suffer.
anonymos 12:36 - Human rights ambassador is not appointed to the Human right commission. He is an autonomous person. thats where the confusion arises. now what does the human rights commission do? and what would be the role of the human rights ambassador?
hear hear! talk about social sector reform rather than the broad concept of human rights reform - talk about housing, education, a healthy living environment - and the reality that none of this can be achieved without money for which we need economic reform! talk about justice rather than human rights, if these things can be achieved, i believe the majority of us will be ecstatic.
Naimbe, everything looks good on paper, isn't it?
What I am concerned about is lack of action, lack of implementation, even when so many unconstitutional things are happening right in our faces.
Rapers remain free, stabbings go on, criminals not brought to trial, etc, etc.
Where is the change we voted for, I ask?
Post a Comment