Friday, February 27, 2009

Stimulating what?

An anonymous commentator on this blog scoffed at MMA’s Governor for advocating “deliberate shrinking of the economy by cutting investments and expenses”. Not too long ago our Majlis, seemingly eager to emulate the economic remedy of the US president Obama, considered a ‘stimulus package’ for our economy. I couldn’t help being a little curious as to what it is that we are talking about “stimulating”?

My good friend and former boss Jaleel, with all his characteristic pugnacity, outlined some interesting issues in his interview to Hirigaa. I’ve tried to add my two cents worth to the issues Jaleel talked about.

1. Lack of natural resources and borrowing - contrary to President Nasheed’s position on the country’s resources, Jaleel acknowledged the dearth of our resources and derided our debt-fueled development philosophy that hinges on the assumption that both the Government and the corporate sector could continue indefinitely with their borrow-your-way-to-prosperity approach.

2. Reigning in government spending – without fiscal discipline and bringing in the much needed public sector reforms, the donor community and institutional sources of concessional finance are unlikely to consider the Maldives seriously. Jaleel also debunked the myth about the much hyped ‘stimulus package’. I can only see reason to agree with him. Our government spending is almost equal to our GDP – thanks to Gayoom’s 30 year legacy. This makes us the highest spending government in the world in relation to the size of the economy – even the highest spending governments like that of Cuba have government expenditures at around 80 percent of their GDP. I am yet to learn about how any increased government spending in Maldives could, as the majlis and my anonymous friend says, ‘stimulate’ the country’s economy. On the contrary, owing to the heavily import-oriented nature of our economy characterized by a high degree of openness, any increased spending in rufiyaa will cause pressure on the rufiyaa/USD exchange rate which is already gasping for its final breath.

3. Decentralization and regional development – Jaleel found the government’s proposal to develop 7 regions to be beyond the capacity and means of the economy. Instead, he opined for a more workable approach of developing 2 regions. He raised an interesting issue about how we could possibly duplicate the USD60 million breakwater around Male, for all our islands. Diseconomies of scale? How about this - Dhuvaafaru, has been developed for 3,000 inhabitants of Kandholhudhoo, at a cost of over Rf390 million and Th. Vilufushi, another island destroyed by tsunami has been developed at whopping cost of Rf 340million for 2,000 or so people. Only two islands developed only for 5,000 people have set us over four-fifths of a billion rufiyaa behind.

4. Front-loading economic reforms – This is perhaps the most important issue Jaleel raised. Over the last few years, we have done an outstandingly good job in the area of legislative and political reforms and human rights. Perhaps there is no other country that made the kind of strides we made in this area in such a short span of time. But on the economic reform side things look dreadfully bleak. We are still too preoccupied with unwarranted political bickering and skullduggery to realize that we are pussyfooting on the much needed economic reforms. On the FDI issue, we are approaching an increasingly moribund world economy, armed only with the anachronistic Law 25/79, to bring in investments into an economy on the brink of bankruptcy. On the trade side, our LDC privileges are fast eroding. Awareness on economic issues? Talk about “TRIPS”, “TRIMs”, “GSP Plus” and other similar issues – I’m certain that most of these terms and issues would be alien even to the most erudite among us, but I bet at least a tenth of our fifth graders would know even the etymology of the word ‘filibustering’. It is little wonder that with only eleven years left for the ‘Vision 2020’ objective of making Maldives a “hub of free trade in the region”, the vision still remains an elusive dream.

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

hus molhu vaahaka. what did this guy jaleel do as trade minister? where is the transhipment port? where is hulhumale phase 2? where is gulhifalhu project? this man is nothing but a big failure. naimbe, you are talking like as if your ex-boss your god friend is the best economist in the world. it is really laughable.

Anonymous said...

to anonymous@12:39 am

Before you laugh or make comments about people, you really should learn a bit more about the past 20 years history besides the political stuff that seems tobe the order of the day. Look at the institutions that are in place and start at least thinking about the people behind them - did you think they happened out of thin air? I agree Jaleel comes across as ego-istic at times, and what people remember most about him are the 'mega-projects'. But I bet you, if you ask anyone who worked with him or Arif Hilmy at any point in their career, they would tell you that these were two people who were extremely committed and hard working, who brought in much economic reform. These were not people who came into political positions; they were people who joined the Ministry of Finance in their late teenage years, straight out of school and worked their way up through hard work, dedication and study. Even when they were in Ministerial positions, they worked hands on, for long hours, alongside even the most junior staff to coach them, to develop them, and to put in place economic structures in the country, to institute transparency and accountability through compiling and publishing economic data and pushing through legislation, raising awareness among the poicy circle, etc etc. Arif Hilmy managed the economic crisis of the early 1990s, with Jaleel in a supporting role. Jaleel managed the crisis of the early 2000s. We got through both times and even managed to bolster our reserves without having to resort to IMF prescribed packages or such. I have personally witnessed them working 20 hours a day in these endeavours. As for specific inititatives, the business profit tax law that was submitted to Majlis by this governemnt was initiated during Arif Hlmy's tenure, compiled during Jaleel's tenure but given the politicisation of issues during the time, never saw the light of day. The MMA act was revised to allow for the insitution to become independent. I could go on, but I won't.

So my friend, when people like Arif and Jaleel talk, they talk from experience, and they know what they are talking about. It is your right to question but perhaps it really reflects more on your ignorance that today you call Jaleel nothing but a big failure, and others like you call Arif other names.

Anonymous said...

.. whao.. The comments of Anon at 12.39 must have been like a missile on target...

It is quite certain that no one would be impressed by the rebuttal, most probably from the horses's mouth.

Such a rebuttal is nothing more than a confession of a guilt by a very guilty mind. Even Arifs name is mentioned in a desperate way. But everyone know that Arif is smarter and is a REAL economist. Arif would never agree to 2 + 2 + 3.

BTW, blowing ones own trumpet about 'compiling and publishing economic data', is may be believable to some but wasn't that the load of crap that kept Maumoons regime on top of league tables for so long as the best performing economy.

Thanks for those great econometric data, we are now a developing country... but only in data and graphs..

Anonymous said...

Dear Naimbe'

This perhaps not have much relevance to this particular post, but I'm going to ask you this anyway as I have been wondering about this for a long time. Often we here about the Maldivian government taking loans from MMA or MMA discounting Treasury notes. My question is, when MMA loan funds to the government through any means (whether it is a direct loan or discounting T-notes ), are they actually printing rufiya to finance this?? Are they saying MMA loaned this much to the government to disguise the fact that the government is printing Rufiyaa.

I'm asking you this because I think you are much more aware of how these things are done in our country, than me.

cheers,

naimbé said...

Anon 12:39, 7:36, 9:20 - I am amazed at how quickly all my posts become the source of acrimonious bickering over personalities. In my previous post I only intended to say something to those the irredeemable optimists who are talking about billionaires and billion dollar investments that an economy that’s entire value only hovers around a billion dollars cannot possibly produce individual billionaires or attract billions of dollars in FDI from just one country. But no sooner had I written the post I found myself unwittingly embroiled in a barrage of criticism over Mr. Adil Saleem’s character and personality.

And now this post, my friends, is not about Mr. Jaeel. To me, the issue here is not about how good an economist Mr. Jaleel is or how well his performance can be compared with that of Mr. Arif Hilmy.

Anon 7:36 – thanks for the detailed response you’ve given to anon 12:39, my friend.

Anon 9:20 – assuming everyone who worked under Gayoom to be a crook might not be the best thing to do. I worked under Arif for a year or so and with Jaleel for several years. I know Jaleel as a boss, mentor, colleague and friend. I know at times he doest appear to be a very pleasant man. But as my friend anon 7:36 said, Jaleel in fact did a remarkable job in managing the crisis of early 2000s.

Yoosuf – well, every time when govt borrows from MMA they don’t have to necessarily print money to finance the loan. But your contention I think is largely true because we’ve been monetizing a large component of our budget deficits for many years. Yes, monetizing deficit is just a fancy term for printing money. And thats something done by govts all over the world. But whether or not a deficit is monetized and the magnitude of it have important macroeconomic ramifications. I'm sure my friend anon 7:36 would be happy to share his/her thoughts on this. ;-)

Anonymous said...

Everytime GOvt needs money, they loan it from MMA. MMA asks for GOVT bonds, they send some papers colorfully decorated that call treasury bonds/bill worth of that loan they require. MMA will print anothr colorful papers and this time call it Rufiyaa and is loaned to GOVT. Ofcourse these things does not happen in physical money. its computerized transactions. GOVT then deposit this money in a bank. BOM for example. BOM then loans these to us.
Isn't that whats happening? Fractional-reserve banking is the key here.

I don't think anyone can give a detail answer to that question, being it vast subject with lots of complications and implications to our general life.
Just imagine, if Govt is borrowing from MMA, and govt controlls the money supply, then where does the money come from to pay back MMA. we'd never be off the debt.

Anonymous said...

Naimbe, your diplomacy training is showing ;-) Sorry, did not mean to make your blog a battlefield...but there are times when it is dificult not to clarify issues.

Re monetization of deficit, I guess when the MMA actually takes on the T-Bills themselves or lends from the Ways and Means account without issuing T-Bills, they are in fact printing money. But, if they sell the T-Bills to other parties, they are not. And I don't really think they are trying to disguise the fact that they are printing money by saying they loaned money to the government - that is probably just the terminology used. I say this because if I remember right, the previous Governor of the MMA talked about this, and in a recent interview in Haveeru, the current Governor's explanations also were quite explicit as to the ramifications of lending to the government. Would you agree, Naimbe? Would be interested to hear any other perspectives on this issue. (Hopefully will not end up in a Governor-bashing :-))

Anonymous said...

.. definitely stimulated the readers..

Anonymous said...

Shiham:
Good point. That is how it is done in US, ie the Govnt borrows from the Fed at interest. Not sure how it is with MMA and govnt here. I think it would be the same.
Anyone here familiar with the legal tender law in Maldives?

Naimbe:
I was thinking the same thing too. What exactly are they trying to stimulate? Given the present parliamentarians, if there ever is a stimulus package, it would only benefit the big businesses.

naimbé said...

Shiham, anon 10:43 and meekaaku – very interesting indeed. It would be much more interesting if you guys come out of anonymity. :-)

Anon 10:43 – no, this has got nothing to do with being diplomatic. Its not that I’m scared to call a spade a spade. Maybe I wasn’t able to explain it well. The thing is every time I talk about an issue the comments are mostly on bashing someone. But as you can see I don’t moderate comments. So, all my friends and all anon visitors to this blog are free to say whatever they want on this blog – of course in civilized language. And yes, I agree with you about the ramifications of lending to the government.

Meekaaku – yes, I agree with you. Any more spending under the pretext of a ‘stimulus package’ is only going to exacerbate a situation that is already beyond redemption. “…the main benefactors will be the resort owners and other big businesses. Again social welfare for the rich.” Yes, looks like that would be inevitable.

Ayya Is said...

Anon 10:43 – “Hopefully will not end up in a Governor-bashing :-))” ok you asked for this. This man fazeel najeeb is not qualified to be the governor of a central bank. He has no training whatsoever in economics. It would be good if he does intellectual property. As naimbe has pointed out in his post we are still unable to follow WTO’s TRIPS because we lack the capacity. How can we develop capacity if the very man trained in intellectual property is doing something totally unrelated? His name was going to be rejected but yameen party and DRP used their influence to get this man to the job simply because he is yameen’s man. And now he appears of TV every other day and preaches the government on reducing government expenditure. Who is he to be talking about fiscal discipline when he himself is in a luxury room with a billion dollar view in a building of his own. This is such a waste to have such a high class building on such a prime space in Male just for MMA. And the other issue is MMA staff pay. Even cleaners are paid like Rf10,000. what fiscal discipline is this mad talking about. I call upon this man to practice what he preach first.

sorry naeembe. i didnt mean to bash someone. i couldnt help doing it.

Anonymous said...

He he....I give up, no more comments...it always ends up in a bash...and you wonder why people want to remain anonymous!!! It is such a luxury in Maldives, Naimbe....

meekaaku said...

I think it is a good thing that Maldives is not implementing TRIPS. We are not really ready for it, especially when it comes to patents. We are nowhere near building the capacity.

Anonymous said...

Oh puleese when ron jeremy and peter north cums to inspect islands for poan villas they will show you what stimulation is. Them to gether with our state minister for incuming 1 billion can stimulat any thing. will have this ms.economy stimulated like a well worked russian prostitute in a lanka hotel room.

Anonymous said...

Adil Saleem is quite a 'stimulator'.... as captured on video.

Anonymous said...

I came across a guy at trade ministry in 2008, who was joking at me when I mentioned "GSP plus" apparently he argued that there was only "GSP".... yeah all of us know the political gossip. Its a pity and our people are so naive.

Anonymous said...

Naimbeeeyyyy, come back to the blog!

Anonymous said...

Ismail Fath'hy, Arif Hilmy, Maumoon AG, Mohamed Jaleel - list of Maldivian poiticians who headed the MMA, Finance Ministry and other financial authorities. They sound "economic" after they resign, retire or regain sanity. They found it "economic" to hold on to a Ministerial post in a not-so-economic-minded government. They all resign with a gala, mega project cover. Colleagues consider them saints. What did they leave behind? ...
These are experts who will know tomorrow why the things he predicted yesterday didn't happen today.
These people know a hundred ways of making love but doesn’t know any women.
Sorry Naimbe, no disrespect for anyone...just my point of view on (former) Maldivian Economists.